A plain-English explanation of what gets scored, what counts as evidence, and how to prepare.
CCO scoring is based on evidence of consistent customer-centric practice. It is not a popularity contest, and it is not based on who can tell the best story. If a practice is real, it leaves artifacts you can review.
Scoring focuses on the practices that reliably improve customer outcomes. These are the parts of how you work that can be explained, repeated, and audited. Most criteria sit in three areas.
Clear ownership, decision rights, and a way to prioritize customer friction across teams.
A repeatable approach to listening, learning, and turning input into actions.
Standards, quality checks, and service recovery that turn intentions into consistent experience.
Evidence is anything that shows the practice is real and repeatable. The best evidence is simple and boring. It is created as a byproduct of doing the work, not as a special document for the audit.
Not everything that sounds impressive is evidence. The items below can support a story, but they do not prove a practice exists.
Each criterion is scored on maturity. The question is not “do you have it”, but “how consistently do you do it”. The rubric below is a helpful way to think about readiness.
The best preparation is to gather what you already use. Avoid creating a parallel set of documents just for certification. If something is missing, create the smallest artifact that makes the practice visible and repeatable.
Reviews focus on clarity and consistency. Assessors will ask for examples, recent artifacts, and how you handle exceptions. The goal is to validate practice, not to catch you out.
Start a shared folder called “CCO Evidence”. Add the last 30 to 60 days of artifacts you already use. If you can show repeatability and ownership, you are closer than you think.
Practical pieces that help you build evidence and repeatability.
How to start with standards, rituals, and evidence you can collect immediately.
Read Article
A lightweight template for resolving problems consistently, with examples of what “good” looks like.
Read Article
Simple measurement ideas for early-stage programs, plus how to avoid vanity metrics.
Read Article